COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. No.: 3074-03
Bill No.: SCS for SB 765
Subject: Counties, Cities, Towns, and Villages
Type: Original
Date: February 18, 2008
Bill Summary: Repeals provisions which allow Villages to incorporate in an alternative way rather than requiring a petition by 2/3 of the taxable inhabitants that is approved by the County Commission.
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUND |
|||
FUND AFFECTED |
FY 2009 |
FY 2010 |
FY 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Estimated Net Effect on General Revenue Fund |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDS |
|||
FUND AFFECTED |
FY 2009 |
FY 2010 |
FY 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Estimated Net Effect on Other State Funds |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses.
This fiscal note contains 4 pages.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS |
|||
FUND AFFECTED |
FY 2009 |
FY 2010 |
FY 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Estimated Net Effect on All Federal Funds |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) |
|||
FUND AFFECTED |
FY 2009 |
FY 2010 |
FY 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Estimated Net Effect on FTE |
0 |
0 |
0 |
☐ Estimated Total Net Effect on All funds expected to exceed $100,000 savings or (cost).
☐ Estimated Net Effect on General Revenue Fund expected to exceed $100,000 (cost).
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS |
|||
FUND AFFECTED |
FY 2009 |
FY 2010 |
FY 2011 |
Local Government |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
Oversight assumes the Senate Committee Substitute adds Section C to this proposal which is a severability clause. Oversight assumes this addition would have no fiscal impact to local governments or to state government.
In response to a previous version, fiscal note 3074-02, SB 765 the following local governments issued the following fiscal impact statements. Oversight assumes the addition of the severability clause would not alter their responses.
St. Louis County officials assume no fiscal impact.
Officials of the Taney County Commission stated that this proposal in their opinion reinstates needed county control over the formation of villages. Absent such control a developer could form a village for the sole purpose of circumventing County Ordinances, including planning and zoning laws. Officials stated that citizens do not benefit from a village with an inadequate financial base that cannot provide even the most basic services. Officials stated that “while difficult to quantify, this proposal has the potential to save Taney County millions of dollars”.
Oversight assumes no state fiscal impact.
FISCAL IMPACT - State Government |
FY 2009 (10 Mo.) |
FY 2010 |
FY 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government |
FY 2009 (10 Mo.) |
FY 2010 |
FY 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business
No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.
FISCAL DESCRIPTION
The proposed legislation appears to have no fiscal impact.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
St. Louis County Executive
Taney County Commission
NOT RESPONDING
Butler County Commission
Callaway County Commission
Cape Girardeau County Commission
Franklin County Commission
Greene County Commission
Hickory County Commission
Jefferson County Commission
New Madrid County Commission
Ozark County Commission
Pulaski County Commission
Bates County Commission
Texas County Commission
Webster County Commission
Warren County Commission
Mickey Wilson, CPA
Director
February 18, 2008