COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH

OVERSIGHT DIVISION


FISCAL NOTE


L.R. No.:         3586-02

Bill No.:          HCS for HB 1595 & 1668

Subject:           Housing, Property, Real and Personal, Revenue Dept., Tax Credits, Taxation and Revenue - Income

Type:              Original

Date:               February 13, 2008




 

Bill Summary:            Would authorize an income tax credit for 50% of the cost of the construction of a storm shelter or $2,000, whichever is less.


FISCAL SUMMARY


ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUND

FUND AFFECTED

FY 2009

FY 2010

FY 2011

General Revenue

(More than $132,001)

(More than $133,228)

(More than $134,225)

 

 

 

 

Total Estimated

Net Effect on

General Revenue

Fund

(More than $132,001)

(More than $133,228)

(More than $134,225)


ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDS

FUND AFFECTED

FY 2009

FY 2010

FY 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Estimated

Net Effect on Other

State Funds

$0

$0

$0


Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses.

This fiscal note contains 5 pages.




ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS

FUND AFFECTED

FY 2009

FY 2010

FY 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

Federal Funds

$0

$0

$0



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE)

FUND AFFECTED

FY 2009

FY 2010

FY 2011

General Revenue

1

1

1

 

 

 

 

Total Estimated

Net Effect on

FTE

1

1

1


Estimated Total Net Effect on All funds expected to exceed $100,000 savings or (cost).


Estimated Net Effect on General Revenue Fund expected to exceed $100,000 (cost).


ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS

FUND AFFECTED

FY 2009

FY 2010

FY 2011

Local Government

$0

$0

$0







FISCAL ANALYSIS


ASSUMPTION


Officials from the University of Missouri, Economic Policy Analysis and Research Center (EPARC) stated that they did not have information on the number of people who might take the tax credit and were unable to estimate the fiscal impact of this proposal.


Officials from Officials from the Office of Administration, Division of Budget and Planning (BAP) assume this proposal would have no fiscal impact on their organization. BAP officials also stated that the proposal would result in an unknown reduction in general and total state revenues.


Officials from the Office of the Secretary of State (SOS) provided the following response.


Many bills considered by the General Assembly include provisions allowing or requiring agencies to submit rules and regulations to implement the act. The SOS is provided with core funding to handle a certain amount of normal activity resulting from each year’s legislative session. The fiscal impact for this fiscal note to SOS for Administrative Rules is less than $2,500. The SOS recognizes that this is a small amount and does not expect that additional funding would be required to meet these costs. However, we also recognize that many such bills may be passed by the General Assembly in a given year and that collectively the costs may be in excess of what our office can sustain with our core budget. Therefore, we reserve the right to request funding for the cost of supporting administrative rules requirements should the need arise based on a review of the finally approved bills signed by the governor.


Officials from the Department of Revenue (DOR) assume this proposal would create a new tax credit; therefore, it would; reduce total state revenues. The proposal would allow a tax credit for the costs incurred in building a storm shelter on or after January 1, 2003. The credit would be limited to $2,000 or 50% of the costs incurred; the credit cannot exceed the taxpayer's tax liability and cannot be refunded or transferred. DOR assumes Personal Tax would require 1 Tax Processing Technician I per 4,000 credits claimed.


DOR also provided this estimate of the IT costs to implement the proposal.


Office of Administration, Information Technology Services Division (ITSD/DOR) assumes the IT portion of this request can be accomplished within existing resources, however; if priorities shift, additional FTE/overtime would be needed to implement. ITSD/DOR estimates that this legislation could be implemented utilizing 1 existing CIT III for 2 months for modifications to MINITS at a total cost of $8,372.


ASSUMPTION (continued)


In summary, DOR submitted a cost estimate to implement this proposal including one additional FTE and related equipment and expense of $36,726 for FY 2009, $38,723 for FY 2010, and $39,884 for FY 2011.


Oversight has, for fiscal note purposes only, changed the starting salary for the new position to correspond to the second step above minimum for comparable positions in the state's merit system pay grid. This decision reflects a study of actual starting salaries for new state employees for a six month period and the policy of the Oversight Subcommittee of the Joint Committee on Legislative Research. Oversight has adjusted the DOR estimate of equipment and expenditure costs in accordance with OA budget guidelines, and Oversight assumes that one additional FTE could be accommodated in existing office space. Oversight assumes the IT requirements for the proposal could be implemented using existing staff.


Oversight assumes that this proposal would result in an unknown loss to the General Revenue Fund in excess of $100,000.


This proposal could reduce Total State Revenue.


FISCAL IMPACT - State Government

FY 2009

(10 Mo.)

FY 2010

FY 2011

GENERAL REVENUE FUND

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost - Department of Revenue

 

 

 

  Personal Service

($18,350)

($22,681)

($23,361)

  Fringe Benefits

($8,114)

($10,029)

($10,330)

  Expense and Equipment

($5,537)

($518)

($534)

 

($32,001)

($33,228)

($34,225)

 

 

 

 

Revenue reduction due to tax credit for storm shelter construction.

(More than $100,000)

(More than $100,000)

(More than $100,000)

 

 

 

 

ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUND 

(More than $132,001)

(More than $133,228)

(More than $134,225)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated Net FTE Effect on General Revenue Fund 

1


1


1

 

 

 

 



FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government

FY 2009

(10 Mo.)

FY 2010

FY 2011

 

 

 

 

 

$0

$0

$0


FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business


This proposal could have a fiscal impact to small businesses which sell or install storm shelters.


FISCAL DESCRIPTION


This proposal would authorize an income tax credit for 50% of the cost of the construction of a storm shelter or $2,000, whichever is less.


This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.


SOURCES OF INFORMATION


Office of the Secretary of State

Office of Administration

            Division of Budget and Planning

Department of Revenue

University of Missouri

            Economic Policy Analysis and Research Center





                                                                                                Mickey Wilson, CPA

                                                                                                Director

                                                                                                February 13, 2008