COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. No.: 3651-01
Bill No.: SJR 29
Subject: Constitutional Amendments; Political Subdivisions; Public Officers.
Type: Original
Date: January 22, 2008
Bill Summary: This proposal requires the official dating standard in the state to be A.D., or Anno Domini, and B.C., or Before Christ.
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUND |
|||
FUND AFFECTED |
FY 2009 |
FY 2010 |
FY 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Estimated Net Effect on General Revenue Fund |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDS |
|||
FUND AFFECTED |
FY 2009 |
FY 2010 |
FY 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Estimated Net Effect on Other State Funds |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses.
This fiscal note contains 6 pages.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS |
|||
FUND AFFECTED |
FY 2009 |
FY 2010 |
FY 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Estimated Net Effect on All Federal Funds |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) |
|||
FUND AFFECTED |
FY 2009 |
FY 2010 |
FY 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Estimated Net Effect on FTE |
0 |
0 |
0 |
☐ Estimated Total Net Effect on All funds expected to exceed $100,000 savings or (cost).
☐ Estimated Net Effect on General Revenue Fund expected to exceed $100,000 (cost).
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS |
|||
FUND AFFECTED |
FY 2009 |
FY 2010 |
FY 2011 |
Local Government |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
Officials at the Office of the Secretary of State assume it is unclear whether this legislation requires that all published dates must include the descriptors A.D. and B.C., or whether the current common practice of no designation could continue. If libraries can continue to use just the year with no qualifying designation, then there will be no impact resulting from this legislation. If libraries are required to add A.D. to published dates, the cost could be in the hundreds of thousands in order to replace handheld date due stamps, revise software stamps and published dated print material.
Officials at the Office of the Secretary of State (SOS) assume many joint resolutions are considered by the General Assembly that would require the SOS to pay for publishing in local newspapers the full text of each statewide ballot measure as directed by Article XII, Section 2(b) of the Missouri Constitution and Section 116.230-116.290, RSMo. The SOS is provided with core funding to handle a certain amount of normal activity resulting from each year’s legislative session. Funding for this item is adjusted each year depending upon the election cycle with $1.6 million historically appropriated in even numbered fiscal years and $100,000 appropriated in odd numbered fiscal years to meet these requirements. The appropriation has historically been an estimated appropriation because the final cost is dependent upon the number of ballot measures approved by the General Assembly and the initiative petitions certified for the ballot. In FY 2007 at the August and November elections there were 6 statewide Constitutional Amendments or ballot propositions that cost $1.2 million to publish (an average of $193,000 per issue). Therefore, the SOS assumes, for the purposes of this fiscal note, that it should have the full appropriation authority it needs to meet the publishing requirements. However, because these requirements are mandatory, we reserve the right to request funding to meet the cost of our publishing requirements if the Governor and the General Assembly change the amount or eliminate the estimated nature of our appropriation.
Oversight assumes the SOS could absorb the costs of advertising the statewide ballot measure related to this proposal within their current appropriation level. If multiple bills pass or if multiple ballot initiatives are validated which require similar advertising at substantial costs, the SOS could request funding through the appropriation process.
Oversight assumes that this is a constitutional amendment and would not impact state funds unless it is passed. Additionally, Oversight assumes that if passed there would be no impact to state funds as agencies could continue to just use the year with no qualifying designation.
ASSUMPTION (continued)
Officials at the State Tax Commission, Department of Mental Health, Office of the Lt. Governor, Department of Higher Education, Office of the State Treasurer, Office of the State Auditor, Department of Economic Development, Department of Public Safety, Fire Safety, Alcohol and Tobacco Control, Water Patrol, Missouri Highway Patrol, Department of Labor and Industrial Relations, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, Department of Health and Senior Services, Missouri Gaming Commission, Department of Insurance, Financial Institutions and Professional Registration, Department of Conservation, Office of the State Public Defenders, Department of Agriculture, Missouri Consolidated Health Care Plan, Department of Social Services, Office of the State Courts Administrator, Joint Committee on Public Employee Retirement, Missouri Veterans Commission, Department of Natural Resources, MO House of Representatives, Office of the Attorney General, Missouri Department of Transportation, Office of the Governor, Missouri Senate, Office of Administration, Department of Revenue, Department of Corrections, Lincoln University, East Central College, Missouri State University, Linn State Technical College, Metropolitan Community College, St. Louis County, University of Missouri, Cass County, City of West Plains and the City of Kansas City assume that there is no fiscal impact from this proposal to their respective institution.
FISCAL IMPACT - State Government |
FY 2009 (10 Mo.) |
FY 2010 |
FY 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government |
FY 2009 (10 Mo.) |
FY 2010 |
FY 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business
No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.
FISCAL DESCRIPTION
The proposed legislation appears to have no fiscal impact.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Office of the Secretary of State
Lincoln University
St. Louis County
State Tax Commission
Department of Mental Health
Office of the Lt. Governor
Department of Higher Education
East Central College
Office of the State Treasurer
Office of the State Auditor
Department of Economic Development
Department of Public Safety
Water Patrol
Fire Safety
Alcohol and Tobacco Control
Missouri Highway Patrol
Department of Labor and Industrial Relations
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Department of Health And Senior Services
Missouri Gaming Commission
Department of Insurance, Financial Institutions and Professional Registration
Cass County
Missouri State University
Department of Conservation
Office of the State Public Defenders
City of West Plains
Department of Agriculture
Missouri Consolidated Health Care Plan
Linn State Technical College
Department of Social Services
SOURCES OF INFORMATION (continued)
City of Kansas City
Office of the State Courts Administrator
Metropolitan Community College
Joint Committee on Public Employee Retirement
Missouri Veterans Commission
Department of Natural Resources
MO House of Representatives
Office of the Attorney General
Missouri Department of Transportation
Office of the Governor
Missouri Senate
Office of Administration
Department of Revenue
Department of Corrections
University of Missouri
Mickey Wilson, CPA
Director
January 22, 2008